Trial reportClinical oral investigations2026
Effects of different dental local anesthesia techniques on salivary cortisol and secretory immunoglobulin a in pediatric patients: a randomized controlled clinical study.
Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesDental local anesthesia may elicit acute stress-related responses in children. This study compared salivary cortisol and secretory immunoglobulin A (s-IgA) responses to conventional anesthesia, conventional anesthesia following topical anesthesia, jet anesthesia, and computer-controlled local anesthesia delivery system (CCLAD), and examined associations between the biomarkers. MATERIALS AND
methods80 healthy children aged 6-9 years were randomly assigned to four anesthesia groups (n = 20/group). Behavioural, physiological, and biochemical responses were assessed using MCDAS, Frankl, SEM, heart rate, salivary cortisol, and s-IgA. Saliva was collected before and after anesthesia and analysed using standardized procedures.
resultsSEM scores increased during anesthesia in all groups (p < 0.05) and were lower with CCLAD than conventional anesthesia (p = 0.004). Cortisol increased after conventional (4.59 ± 2.45 to 6.07 ± 2.78 nmol/L; p < 0.001) and jet anesthesia (6.49 ± 4.42 to 8.07 ± 5.51 nmol/L; p = 0.007), but not after conventional anesthesia following topical anesthesia or CCLAD (p > 0.05). s-IgA decreased after conventional and jet anesthesia (p < 0.001), with no significant changes in the other groups. Baseline s-IgA concentrations differed among groups (p < 0.001). Changes in cortisol and s-IgA were negatively correlated in the conventional anesthesia following topical anesthesia and CCLAD groups (p < 0.001).
conclusionTaken together, the findings indicate that local anesthesia protocols are associated with different behavioural and biochemical response patterns in pediatric patients. CCLAD was associated with lower procedural SEM scores, while salivary cortisol and s-IgA responses varied across protocols. These patterns should not be interpreted as evidence that any technique definitively reduces psychological stress. Salivary s-IgA may have potential as a complementary stress-related biomarker, although further studies are needed to establish its clinical applicability. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: CCLAD was associated with lower SEM scores during anesthesia compared with conventional anesthesia, while no significant pre-to-post changes in salivary cortisol or s-IgA were observed in the CCLAD or conventional anesthesia following topical anesthesia groups. These findings may inform the clinical selection of anesthesia protocols; however, changes in cortisol and s-IgA should be interpreted as stress-related biomarker responses rather than direct evidence of reduced psychological stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42814201What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.