SynthesisArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2026
Operative treatment of high-grade medial collateral ligament injury and chronic medial knee instability: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-grade medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury and chronic medial knee instability can compromise both valgus and rotational control, especially in cruciate or multiligament injury. This systematic review evaluated operative treatment according to clinical phenotype rather than MCL grade alone. PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science Core Collection were searched from January 1, 2000, to August 10, 2026; a Cochrane CENTRAL update was completed on September 7, 2026. Eligible clinical reports included operative treatment of acute high-grade MCL/medial-complex injury or chronic symptomatic medial instability. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2, ROBINS-I, or the Joanna Briggs Institute case-series checklist. Thirty-five reports were included: 5 randomized or quasi-randomized trials, 9 nonrandomized comparative studies, and 21 case series. Routine acute medial surgery during ACL reconstruction was not consistently superior across heterogeneous grade III populations. In contrast, selected displaced distal or Stener-like lesions were plausible repair targets because interposition can prevent healing in apposition. Chronic symptomatic valgus and/or anteromedial rotatory insufficiency was most often treated with reconstruction, with directional improvement in objective stability and patient-reported outcomes in case series. Evidence for augmentation, the optimal reconstruction construct, and timing remains low certainty. Decisions should integrate repairability, residual valgus and rotational instability, associated ligament injury, alignment, and tissue quality. Prospective phenotype-stratified comparative studies using standardized stability, return-to-sport, complication, and long-term joint-preservation outcomes are required.Level of evidence: Level IV, systematic review of Level I-IV therapeutic studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.