ArticleInsights into imaging2026
The swallow tail sign: mechanisms, neuroimaging advances and future perspectives.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD), the second most common neurodegenerative disorder, poses a significant challenge to elderly health. Its diagnosis currently relies primarily on clinical symptoms, which often proves inadequate for differentiating PD from other forms of parkinsonism, particularly in early disease stages. Although positron emission tomography (PET) has offered compelling evidence supporting the differential diagnosis of PD, its high cost and radiation exposure limit its widespread use. Consequently, there is a pressing need for more accessible, convenient, non-invasive, and safe diagnostic approaches. The "swallow tail sign" (STS)-an MRI-based biomarker characterized by a hyperintensity in the posterolateral substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc), surrounded by hypointense areas-has emerged as a highly promising adjunct tool. This biomarker holds potential not only to enhance diagnostic certainty in distinguishing PD from similar neurodegenerative disorders but also to improve the understanding of its pathophysiology. In this review, we outline the anatomical basis of the STS and the pathological changes in PD leading to its disappearance. We further summarize its applications across various magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques and evaluate its value in identifying PD and differentiating it from other parkinsonian syndromes. With significant advancements in ultra-high-field MRI (≥ 7 T) and artificial intelligence (AI), combined with other MRI biomarkers, the value of STS will be further explored in the future. KEY POINTS: Question Despite its diagnostic potential, the biological basis, imaging interpretation, and clinical utility of the STS remain incompletely understood and warrant further investigation in parkinsonism. Findings The normal STS appears as dorsolateral nigral hyperintensity on susceptibility-sensitive MRI, while its attenuation or loss in PD supports cautious adjunctive diagnostic use. Critical Relevance Statement This review critically evaluates the biological basis, MRI interpretation, diagnostic limitations, and evolving multimodal and AI-based assessment of the STS, guiding radiologists toward its standardized and cautious adjunct use in the clinical imaging assessment of parkinsonism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.