ArticleUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Small renal tumors in geriatric patients-surveillance, biopsy, or surgery?]
Article in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increasing life expectancy has led to a rise in the number of elderly patients with incidental small renal masses (SRMs). These tumors often show slow growth and can be safely monitored in selected cases. Studies demonstrate effective oncological control through active surveillance in elderly patients, particularly in those with low tumor progression and significant comorbidities. Histological subtype impacts growth behavior and metastatic potential. While a biopsy may help to avoid overtreatment, its value must be critically assessed in older patients. Surgical treatment, including partial and radical nephrectomy, remains associated with acceptable complication rates even in the very elderly, particularly in high-volume centers. However, studies show that surgical intervention does not necessarily confer a survival advantage in this population. Minimally invasive and ablative approaches, such as cryo- and microwave ablation, are gaining importance, especially in patients with increased frailty or impaired renal function. The use of geriatric assessments, particularly the G8 score, helps to identify vulnerable individuals and supports individualized treatment decisions. Age alone should not be a contraindication to oncological therapy but should prompt a careful risk-benefit assessment. The goal must be a personalized, risk-adapted therapeutic approach that balances quality of life, functional preservation, and oncological control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42814172What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.