ArticleDiabetologia2026
Comparative hepatic effectiveness of empagliflozin vs dapagliflozin among individuals with type 2 diabetes and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.
Article in Diabetologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aims/hypothesisWhile both empagliflozin and dapagliflozin are known to improve hepatic steatosis and liver enzyme levels, robust phase 3 trial evidence for improving steatohepatitis and fibrosis is currently exclusive to dapagliflozin. Therefore, a head-to-head comparison between two agents is warranted, to compare the hepatic outcomes between empagliflozin and dapagliflozin in individuals with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD).
methodsUsing nationwide Korean claims data, we constructed a new-user cohort of adults with MASLD, defined as having type 2 diabetes and a fatty liver index (FLI) ≥60, who initiated empagliflozin or dapagliflozin between May 2016 and December 2023. Outcomes of interest were FLI-defined MASLD regression (achieving FLI <30) and decompensated hepatic events (ascites, variceal bleeding, hepatic failure, liver transplantation). After 1:1 propensity score matching, HRs and 95% CIs were estimated using Cox models.
resultsAmong 265,098 new users of empagliflozin and dapagliflozin, 101,487 pairs were 1:1 propensity score-matched (mean age 54.3 years; male 71.3%). Compared with dapagliflozin, empagliflozin was associated with a marginally higher likelihood of FLI-defined MASLD regression (HR 1.06; 95% CI 1.00, 1.11). The risk of decompensated hepatic events was comparable (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.94, 1.03). Dose-stratified analyses yielded consistent findings in both FLI-defined MASLD regression (low-dose: HR 1.19; 95% CI 0.77, 1.83; high-dose: 1.14; 1.01, 1.28) and decompensated hepatic events (low-dose: 0.95; 0.74, 1.23; high-dose: 1.04; 0.93, 1.15). CONCLUSIONS/
interpretationAmong individuals with MASLD, no significant differences were observed between empagliflozin and dapagliflozin in the risk of decompensated hepatic events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42814151What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.