Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42813993›Full record

ReviewJournal of animal science2026

ASAS-NANP symposium: mathematical modeling in animal nutrition: Model Transfer and Application in Livestock Production Systems.

Hector M Menendez, Jordan M Adams, Karun Kaniyamattam, Luis O Tedeschi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hector M MenendezDepartment of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Rapid City, SD 57703, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9092-7237
Jordan M AdamsDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2471, United States.
Karun KaniyamattamDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2471, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0557-3575
Luis O TedeschiDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2471, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1883-4911

Funding

SDSU Agriculture Experimental StationUSDA-AFRI IDEAS 2022-69014-36670- 675 36670USDA Hatch #SD00H729-23USDA-NRCSU.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS) NR233A750008C011Use of Livestock Feeding Management through the National Animal Nutrition Program (NANP)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mathematical models have long supported nutrition management in livestock systems, progressing from early National Research Council empirical tables to complex mechanistic frameworks such as the Ruminant Nutrition System. What is less documented is how models are operationalized in commercial practice, particularly as data streams from precision livestock technologies, remote sensing, and other Internet of Things technologies are increasingly hybridized into existing modeling frameworks. A prevailing assumption is that greater sensing, automation, or algorithmic complexity will naturally translate into better decisions; however, adoption and impact in commercial systems remain uneven. To examine how models are actually used under real-world constraints, we conducted a literature review and semi-structured interviews (n = 11) with livestock producers, technology developers, consultants, and value-chain actors working at the interface of biology, data, models, and farm decision-making. Six cross-cutting themes emerged: 1) model augmentation of systems, 2) model predictive control (MPC), 3) human centered adoption, 4) technology fit, 5) data bottlenecks, and 6) data enlightened value chain. Collectively, these insights re-center nutrition as the integrating discipline for productivity, welfare, and sustainability, and emphasize MPC and open, interoperable data pipelines, as prerequisites for moving beyond pilots toward durable adoption. Interviewees consistently emphasized that meaningful impact depends on aligning biological realism, software engineering, and value-chain incentives so that models support actionable decisions under commercial constraints, rather than pursuing automation for its own sake.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaLivestockModels, BiologicalAnimalsInterviews as Topicequitable profitfeed managementfood system transformationmodel predictive controltranslational models

Identifiers

PMID42813993
PMCPMC13681650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.