ArticleJMIR medical education2026
Development and Educational Evaluation of a Radiation Visualization System in a Virtual Reality Training Module for Radiopharmaceutical Administration: Mixed Methods Study of Students' Learning Experiences.
Article in JMIR medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Our research group previously developed a virtual reality (VR) training module for radiopharmaceutical administration, focusing on procedural skills and patient interactions. The module's educational effectiveness was validated with objective measures, such as electroencephalography and mood assessments. Objective: The authors aimed to extend the module by integrating a radiation visualization system that renders otherwise invisible radiation fields within an immersive VR environment, and to compare students' learning experiences associated with the module with those associated with conventional hands-on training. Methods: Twenty students enrolled in a radiological technician training program participated in this study. Students' learning experiences were evaluated using Likert-scale-based questionnaires, together with qualitative analysis of open-ended responses. Results: VR-based training was associated with significantly higher ratings for students' conceptual understanding of radiation behavior, radiation safety awareness, learning satisfaction, and self-assessed competency than conventional training. Conversely, perceived realism and immersion were rated significantly higher following conventional training. No significant differences were observed for operational understanding, technical skills, or system usability. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the developed VR module offers a safe and repeatable training platform that may support positively perceived learning experiences in radiopharmaceutical administration and radiation safety education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.