Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42813733›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of dermatology2026

Implementation of Total Body Photography for Skin Cancer Early Detection: A Systematic Review.

Nurul Amanina Binte Hussain, Frances Alice Ansah-Sasraku, Pablo Fernández-Peñas, Nicole Gillespie, Peter Hans Soyer, Ingrid Hickman, Monika Janda

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nurul Amanina Binte HussainFrazer Institute, Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0991-496X
Frances Alice Ansah-SasrakuFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7048-6934
Pablo Fernández-PeñasFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4882-1564
Nicole GillespieMelbourne Business School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6101-2123
Peter Hans SoyerFrazer Institute, Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4770-561X
Ingrid HickmanFaculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3205-9165
Monika JandaFrazer Institute, Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1728-8085

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 2006551NHMRC Fellowship 2034422NHMRC Synergy Grant 2009923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in imaging technologies, such as total body photography (TBP), and the increasing capabilities and use of artificial intelligence (AI) have the potential to enhance skin screening and skin cancer surveillance. However, limited research has examined how these technologies are implemented and integrated into clinical practice across different healthcare settings. This review examined the literature regarding the implementation and utility of TBP technologies over time. A systematic search identified 36 studies published from inception through to July 2025, describing TBP use and reported facilitators and barriers. Specifically, the review mapped TBP workflows, processes, workforce roles, contextual reporting, and evaluation of real-world integration. Findings were synthesized using a narrative synthesis approach due to the heterogeneity in study designs, objectives, and reporting quality. The evidence base was largely implementation light, and no study applied a formal implementation science framework. Thirty-six studies were included because they provided contextual information on TBP use. Only six studies reported any implementation-related aspects, such as the feasibility of replicating TBP protocols across healthcare settings; user perceptions; and the practical use of TBP technologies and/or AI features. Reported technological advancements included digitally enabled and automated systems supporting skin lesion documentation, monitoring, and diagnostic decision-making. Despite these technological shifts, descriptions of TBP work processes remained relatively consistent over time. Several studies reported on the feasibility of healthcare professionals from multiple disciplines to conduct TBP-aided skin examinations. The findings highlight opportunities for TBP technologies to be scaled into a broader range of clinical and potentially resource-constrained settings.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerPhotographySkin NeoplasmsWhole Body ImagingHumansWorkflowhealth system and servicesskin cancer preventiontotal body photography

Identifiers

PMID42813733
PMCPMC13646481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.