ArticleNursing open2026
Mapping the Evidence on Midline Catheter Tip Location, Confirmation Methods and Associated Characteristics: A Scoping Review.
Article in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMidline catheters (MCs) are increasingly utilized as an alternative to peripheral and central venous catheters. However, the lack of standardized protocols for tip location and confirmation methods remains a significant barrier to patient safety and clinical decision-making.
aimThis scoping review aimed to systematically map the current evidence and evolving clinical practices regarding MC tip placement, specifically exploring tip location standards, confirmation methods and associated clinical characteristics.
designScoping review. REVIEW
methodsThe scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley framework and PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines. Two independent reviewers conducted screening and data extraction, with descriptive methods used for synthesis. DATA SOURCES: Eleven databases (platforms) were searched from inception to 31 August 2026: the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, CINAHL, CNKI, Wanfang Data, SinoMed and VIP databases.
resultsOut of 762 initial records, 41 publications met eligibility criteria. North American guidelines strictly restrict MC tips to the peripheral axilla, whereas European consensus advocates for deeper placement into the thoracic axillary or subclavian veins. Tip confirmation practices are heterogeneous. Methods range from external anatomical measurement to ultrasound guidance and post-procedural radiography. A significant limitation identified is the reduced reliability of ultrasound for tip visualization in patients with morbid obesity, often necessitating alternative confirmation or resulting in indeterminate placement. The quality and comparability of outcome data across studies were limited by inconsistent tip location definitions, heterogeneous patient populations and variable follow-up durations.
conclusionThis review highlights substantial heterogeneity in clinical practice and guideline recommendations. The association between tip position and catheter-related complications is multifactorial. This scoping review identifies that current evidence is inadequate to support a clear preference for any single midline catheter tip-positioning strategy. These findings set an agenda for future research to inform standardized, evidence-based midline catheter practice guidelines. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION: Clinical nurses and vascular access specialists should be aware of divergent international guideline suggestions for midline catheter tip positioning. Consensus-based definitions for implantation depth and target veins, together with consistent anatomical terminology, are needed to support cross-study comparison. Optimized multimodal tip-confirmation workflows may reduce unnecessary X-ray use and improve safety, supported by targeted education and interprofessional collaboration. Future prospective cohort studies and comparative trials are needed to evaluate the relationship between tip location, confirmation strategies and patient-important clinical outcomes. IMPACT: This scoping review synthesizes existing international literature on midline catheter tip-related practices and exposes inconsistencies across guideline documents. It draws attention to key unresolved clinical questions and provides clear directions for subsequent primary research. The findings may support the development of future consensus statements and help reduce practice variation in midline catheter care. REPORTING
methodPRISMA-ScR. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution. REVIEW PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: https://osf.io/fn8vz/overview.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.