Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42813602›Full record

ArticleExperimental physiology2026

The theoretical basis of reservoir pressure in arteries.

Kim H Parker, Alun D Hughes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kim H ParkerDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College, London, UK.
Alun D HughesInstitute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

British Heart Foundation RE/24/130013HORIZON EUROPE Innovative Europe HORIZON-RIA 10113672National Institute for Health Research University of London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre BRC894/CM/AH/101320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The separation of measured arterial pressure into a reservoir pressure and an excess pressure was introduced over 20 years ago as a heuristic hypothesis. Since then it has gained some traction through epidemiological studies that show that various measures of reservoir and excess pressure are independent risk factors for cardiovascular disease. We demonstrate that a two-time asymptotic analysis of the 1-D conservation equations in each artery coupled with the separation of the arteries into inviscid and viscid arteries, based on their resistance or drag coefficients, results in a formal derivation of the reservoir pressure. The most important result of this analysis is that flow in the arteries can be considered quasi-steady during every interval on the slow time scale. The slow-time conservation equations involve a drag coefficient that models the effect of viscosity on the flow. We separate the arteries into the larger inviscid arteries where viscosity is negligible and the smaller viscid arteries where it is not. The slow time pressure in the inviscid arteries is shown to be spatially uniform but varying in time. We identify this pressure as the reservoir pressure. Dynamic analysis using mass and energy conservation in the inviscid arteries shows that the reservoir pressure accounts for the storage of potential energy by the distension of the elastic inviscid arteries during early systole and its release during late systole and diastole. This analysis thus provides a formal derivation of the reservoir pressure and ascribes its physical meaning.

Indexed as

blood pressurehaemodynamicsreservoir‐excess pressure analysistwo‐time analysis

Identifiers

PMID42813602
PMCPMC13625594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.