ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2026
Pulling and gripping: Proteasomal translocation pathway elements differentially contribute to substrate unfolding.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pulling and gripping: Proteasomal translocation pathway elements differentially contribute to substrate unfolding.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Eukaryotic proteomes are regulated by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Unwanted proteins are tagged with ubiquitin, which is recognized by the 26S proteasome for degradation. To enter the proteasome's 20S core particle and be hydrolyzed into peptides, the substrate must be unfolded and threaded through the 19S regulatory particle. Tyrosine "aromatic paddles" of the regulatory particle's Rpt motor subunits unfold and translocate the substrate by pulling it toward the core particle. We previously showed that for substrates degraded from their N-termini, polyglycine tracts inserted before a stable domain impair the proteasome's ability to grip or unfold the substrate at multiple points along the translocation pathway. Herein we compare unfolding from the N- and C-termini of model substrates. We find that a combination of local substrate structural elements, grip sequence, and possibly fundamental asymmetry of the proteasomal unfolding machinery that favors N-terminal unfolding affect the proteasome's ability to unfold substrates. Although the basic unfolding and translocation mechanism is conserved regardless of substrate orientation, we find differences in the ability of polyglycine tracts to disrupt unfolding from the N versus the C terminus. Finally, comparison of the rates of unfolding versus substrate release shows that different regions along the translocation pathway employ different mechanisms to facilitate unfolding and translocation. Interactions with aromatic paddles primarily increase the rate of substrate unfolding, while interactions predicted to take place with the core particle α-ring N-termini primarily decrease the rate of premature release of partially degraded substrates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.