ArticleInternational wound journal2026
Healthcare Professionals' Experiences of the Causes of Recurrent Pressure Injuries-A Phenomenographic Study.
Article in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are few previous studies regarding recurrent pressure injuries, most of which investigate surgical outcomes. From the perspective of the healthcare system, recurrent pressure ulcers may indicate shortcomings in quality, as preventive measures have failed not just once, but on several occasions. We aimed to examine how healthcare professionals working with wound care in specialised inpatient care perceived the causes of recurrent pressure injuries in patients with spinal cord injuries. A phenomenographic study using in-depth interviews was conducted. We identified four categories of the experienced causes of recurrent pressure injuries based on the respondents' subjective accounts: recurrent wounds are due to physical and mental vulnerability in the patient; recurrent wounds are due to a lack of compliance in patients and professionals; recurrent wounds are the result of fruitless endeavours to prevent them; recurrent wounds are due to neglect in healthcare. The causes were described as originating from different structural levels within society. However, preventive measures were primarily perceived as having been assigned at the patient and healthcare staff levels. The elderly were described as particularly vulnerable, whilst care and community interventions declined with increasing age. The participants emphasised that the changes in clinical practice that need to be prioritised primarily concern fundamental principles, in particular person-centred and inclusive care. Furthermore, a clearer division of responsibilities was highlighted as crucial, as patients in need of multimodal interventions have been found to fall between the cracks in a diagnosis-based healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.