ArticleClinical and translational science2026
From Real World Data to Real Impact: A Co-Medication Framework for Lung Cancer to Advance DDI Assessment and Patient-Centric Drug Development.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer predominantly affects older adults who already experience comorbidities and are at increased risk of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) due to polypharmacy. Traditional DDI assessments often do not fully capture complex co-medication patterns observed in real-world practice due to the risk of introducing confounding factors. This study used U.S. Optum claims data from 2019 to 2024 to characterize co-medication patterns in predominately non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and map enzyme- and transporter-mediated liabilities across commonly used medications, chemotherapy agents, and biomarker-driven therapies. Potential DDI liabilities were further prioritized using a semi-quantitative clinical framework based on perpetrator strength, substrate sensitivity, narrow therapeutic index status, and available evidence. Frequently used medications included disease-specific supportive therapies such as ondansetron and dexamethasone, as well as treatments for common U.S. comorbidities such as cardiovascular and endocrine disorders. Many of the co-medications were substrates, inhibitors, and inducers of pathways critical for NSCLC treatments such as CYP3A, CYP2D6, P-gp, and OATP1B and additional risks were identified when giving treatments with acid-reducing agents or QT-prolonging drugs. These findings demonstrate how integrating real-world data (RWD) can strengthen DDI assessment by improving clinical trial design, informing risk-mitigation strategies, and supporting more patient-centric drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.