Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42813353›Full record

Observational studyActa orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica2026

Does Pin Removal at Three Versus Five Weeks Influence Clinical Outcomes in Gartland Type III Supracondylar Humerus Fractures? A Comparative Study.

Nazan Çevik, Yavuz Akalın, Hünkar Çağdaş Bayrak, Özgür Avcı, Hüseyin Yetkin, Mert Güneş, Alpaslan Öztürk

Abstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nazan ÇevikDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-9596-8502
Yavuz AkalınDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-7967-7054
Hünkar Çağdaş BayrakDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0003-4963-9980
Özgür AvcıDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-2188-1471
Hüseyin YetkinDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0000-5996-6852
Mert GüneşDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0006-1287-9843
Alpaslan ÖztürkDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-7362-0284

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe optimal timing of pin removal following closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) for pediatric Gartland type 3 supracondylar humerus fractures remains controversial. Although pins are commonly removed between the third and fifth postoperative weeks, high-level evidence comparing clinical and radiological outcomes between these time points is limited. This study aimed to evaluate whether pin removal at the third vs. the fifth postoperative week influences radiographic healing or functional outcomes.

methodsThis retrospective observational study included 95 pediatric patients (aged 3-10 years) with Gartland type 3 supracondylar humerus fractures treated with CRPP between 2020 and 2025. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the timing of pin removal: the third week (n = 42) and the fifth week (n = 53). Clinical outcomes included elbow range of motion (ROM), carrying angle difference, and the Flynn criteria at 3 and 6 months. Radiological outcomes included Baumann angle, anterior humeral line alignment, and the Radiographic Union Score for Tibia scores. Multivariable linear regression was performed to control for potential confounders. Interobserver reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients.

resultsAt 3 months, flexion and extension loss were modestly lower in the third-week group (P = .011, r = 0.26 and P = .031, r = 0.22, respectively). However, no significant differences were observed between groups at 6 months in terms of flexion loss, extension loss, total motion loss, carrying angle difference, or Flynn scores (all P > .05). Radiographic Union Score for Tibia scores at the time of pin removal were higher in the fifth-week group (P < .001), reflecting later radiographic assessment; however, no differences were observed at subsequent follow-ups. No cases of loss of reduction, angular deformity, or reoperation occurred in either group. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that pin removal timing was associated with early but not late motion loss.

conclusionPin removal at the third postoperative week did not compromise final radiological outcomes. In contrast, removal at the fifth week did not confer superior long-term functional recovery. Within the commonly practiced third-to-fifth-week interval, timing of pin removal does not appear to influence final clinical outcomes in pediatric Gartland type 3 supracondylar humerus fractures.   Cite this article as: Çevik N, Akalın Y, Bayrak HÇ, et al. Does pin removal timing influence outcomes in Gartland type 3 supracondylar humerus fractures? A comparative study of third- and fifth-week removal. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc., 2026; 60(4), 0936, doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2026.26936.

Indexed as

Bone NailsHardware RemovalHumeral FracturesHumeral Fractures, DistalChildChild, PreschoolClosed Fracture ReductionElbow JointFemaleFracture HealingHumansMaleRadiographyRange of Motion, ArticularRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsElbow range of motionGartland classificationPercutaneous pinningPin removal timingSupracondylar humerus fracture

Identifiers

PMID42813353
PMCPMC13657337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.