ArticleJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS2026
Linguistic features from paragraph recall are markers of cognitive impairment.
Article in Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveCognitive impairment is associated with language changes that emerge during verbal responses to neuropsychological assessments that traditional scoring does not capture. The current study investigated the utility of a linguistic analysis of paragraph recall responses for detecting cognitive impairment.
methodsDigital voice recordings of logical memory (LM) were available from 598 Long Life Family Study participants with normal cognition and 112 with cognitive impairment. Linguistic polyfeature scores for immediate (PFS-IR) and delayed recall (PFS-DR) were created from weighted sums of features associated with cognitive impairment. Logistic regression models assessed the predictive value of each PFS for classifying cognitive impairment. Repeated measures models with generalized estimating equations assessed whether PFSs predict cognitive screener performance over time.
resultsTwelve linguistic features and higher PFSs were associated with cognitive impairment (PFS-IR OR = 1.05; PFS-DR OR = 1.07). PFS-DR scores approximated the accuracy of traditional LM scoring (AUC-PR = 0.77 vs. 0.81, respectively). A higher PFS-DR was also associated with lower cognitive screener scores over an average of 7 years of follow-up (
conclusionQuantification of linguistic features from paragraph recall identified distinct linguistic markers that reflect differences in learning, retention, and self-monitoring. Summary feature scores detected cognitive impairment and predicted lower cognitive performance over time. This approach has potential implications for automated testing, recording, and scoring pipelines allowing for implementation of gold-standard neuropsychological assessments in broader clinical and research settings. Further studies are needed to validate these findings across clinical and community-based populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.