ArticleJournal of inherited metabolic disease2026
Essential Oral Single Nutritional Therapy Products for Inherited Metabolic Diseases: Evidence and Consensus Assessment Using a Modified Delphi Method.
Article in Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Essential Oral Single Nutritional Therapy Products for Inherited Metabolic Diseases: Evidence and Consensus Assessment Using a Modified Delphi Method.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nutritional therapy is critical in managing inherited metabolic diseases (IMDs), and includes specialized diets and single nutritional therapy products (sNTPs) such as vitamins, cofactors, and amino acids. Many sNTPs function as medicines, but are regulated as food (e.g., food supplements), which can limit access, reimbursement, and consistent supply. Essential medicines, as defined by World Health Organization (WHO), meet key healthcare needs and must be available, affordable, and quality-assured. Some sNTPs might meet this threshold, supporting their potential inclusion in the WHO essential medicines list. A modified Delphi process was conducted with a panel of 36 experts from 18 European countries to identify which sNTPs are essential for IMD treatment. Ninety-six sNTPs and their target IMDs were assessed using a literature-informed five-criteria framework, that included evaluation of the level of scientific evidence for usefulness and effectiveness. Overall, 31 sNTPs were deemed essential in the management of 55 IMDs, consisting of vitamins (n = 12), minerals (n = 4), amino acids (n = 6), sugars (n = 2), and other nutrients (n = 7). Evidence supporting their use ranged from levels 3 to 4 of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM), reflecting the limited clinical trial data inherent to rare diseases. Seven of these are already included in the WHO essential medicines list. Recognition of the remaining 24 essential sNTPs could improve their availability and reimbursement, and in some cases, may warrant formal authorization as medicines. Subsequent research should focus on access inequities, cost barriers, and incorporate patient perspectives to optimize the use and impact of sNTPs in IMD management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.