ArticleCureus2026
Association of Preoperative Midazolam Administration With Patient Anxiety During the Transition From the Preoperative Holding Bay to the Operating Room: A Prospective Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background Among patients awaiting surgical procedures, up to 80% experience anxiety. Midazolam is commonly administered in the preoperative holding bay to reduce anxiety. However, the effect of benzodiazepines can last longer than surgery and may lead to an increased risk of neurocognitive impairment. Thus, we looked into the effects of midazolam administration beyond the preoperative holding bay. We hypothesized that omitting midazolam in the holding bay increases anxiety in the operating room and the risk of unpleasant explicit recall. Methods This study included adult patients undergoing surgical procedures at Montefiore Medical Center (June-August 2024). Anxiety was assessed using the anxiety component of the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale, and midazolam was administered accordingly. We assessed postoperative unpleasant explicit recall in a follow-up survey. Mixed-effects linear and modified Poisson regression models were used for analyses. Results Among 765 patients studied, 27.5% received midazolam. The mean (standard deviation (SD)) anxiety level was 7.8 (4.3) in the holding bay and 7.9 (4.7) in the operating room. Compared to the non-midazolam group, those receiving midazolam experienced decreased anxiety from the preoperative holding bay to the operating room (adjusted mean difference (AMD): -2.0; 95% confidence interval (CI): -2.5 to -1.5; p<0.001). The association was stronger in female patients (AMD: -2.9; 95% CI: -3.5 to -2.3; p<0.001) versus male patients (AMD: -0.9; 95% CI: -1.6 to -0.1; p=0.029) and in younger (≤30) patients (AMD: -3.8; 95% CI: -5.1 to -2.6; p<0.001) versus older patients (AMD: -1.8; 95% CI: -2.4 to -1.3; p<0.001). In the follow-up cohort, midazolam demonstrated a trend towards reduced postoperative unpleasant explicit recall (adjusted risk ratio: 0.6; 95% CI: 0.4 to 1.1; p=0.103). The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale in the midazolam group (0 (0-0); median (interquartile range (IQR)) indicated effective anxiolysis without sedation. Conclusions In summary, our data show that anxiety levels increase from the preoperative holding bay to the operating room, an effect that was mitigated in patients who received a mean (SD) of 1.9 (0.6) mg of midazolam. This anxiolytic benefit was magnified in female and younger patients. These findings underscore the importance of continuous, structured anxiety assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.