ArticleCase reports in dentistry2026
Failure of Guided Endodontic Access in a Severely Obliterated Root Canal: A Case Report of Drill Deviation.
Article in Case reports in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulp canal obliteration (PCO) increases the risk of procedural errors during canal localization. Guided endodontics improves access accuracy, but its success depends on precise guide design, proper drill-sleeve alignment, and material stability. When these factors are compromised, deviations and unsuccessful canal location may occur. The present clinical case reports the management of a severely obliterated root canal in a maxillary lateral incisor in which static-guided endodontic failed to achieve canal localization, emphasizing the technical limitations and the successful conventional approach. A 69-year-old female patient presented with a maxillary lateral incisor exhibiting severe PCO. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) confirmed obliteration of the cervical and middle thirds of the root canal. Despite careful planning and the use of a static endodontic guide, canal localization failed after repeated drill deviations toward the palatal aspect. Investigation revealed palatal wear of the resin template adjacent to the metallic sleeve, and the mismatch between the drill's active length and the guide sleeve's dimensions may have contributed to the observed deviation. The canal was successfully localized under operating-microscope magnification using ultrasonic tips, guided by anatomical information obtained from postoperative CBCT imaging. Cleaning, shaping, and obturation were completed without complications. After 3 years, the patient remains asymptomatic, with radiographic signs of satisfactory healing. This case reinforces that guided endodontics-although valuable-requires meticulous planning, precise drill-sleeve compatibility, and strict guide validation. Clinicians must remain proficient in conventional techniques for cases in which guided access fails.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.