ArticleDepression and anxiety2026
Perceived Disinformation, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptoms in the Czech Population: Age-Specific Associations.
Article in Depression and anxiety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The main goal of the study was to examine the relationship between anxiety and depressive symptoms and the perception of disinformation in the Czech population. The research was performed on a sample of 2867 respondents. Analytical processing was carried out through quasi-Poisson regression analysis separately for the three age groups (aged 16-39, 40-64, and 65-90). The dependent variables were the GAD-7 (Generalised Anxiety Disorder) and PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire) total scores, measuring anxiety and depressive symptoms, respectively. The independent variables were represented by the subjective perception of exposure, severity of disinformation, and credibility of specific disinformation in the Czech Republic. The 11 narratives, verified by a fact-checking organisation, were examined, of which eight were disinformation claims and three were factual reports. The outcomes demonstrated that 69.3% of the population experienced no or minimal anxiety, 19.0% mild, 7.2% moderate, and 4.5% severe anxiety. In the case of depression, 43.0% of the population demonstrated minimal symptoms, 25.4% mild, 9.9% moderate, and 14.3% no symptoms. After Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery-rate (FDR) adjustment, perceived exposure to disinformation remained positively associated with GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores across all three age groups. Among the 66 narrative-specific tests, 20 of 33 GAD-7 associations and 17 of 33 PHQ-9 associations remained statistically significant after FDR correction. The retained associations varied by narrative and age group rather than indicating a uniform age gradient. Because the data are cross-sectional, these associations do not establish causal direction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.