ArticleNutrition today
Protein and Amino Acid Supplementation in Military Personnel: Accessibility, Prevalence, and Effectiveness.
Article in Nutrition today. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein and amino acid supplements are among the most widely used dietary supplements by active-duty military personnel and other physically active young adults, primarily to increase muscle mass, enhance recovery, support physical performance, and meet protein needs during strenuous training and operations. Randomized controlled studies conducted in laboratory settings demonstrate that supplemental protein and amino acids can enhance muscle and whole-body protein-related responses to military-relevant stressors under highly controlled conditions, and military nutrition policies acknowledge their potential benefit when food intake or logistical constraints impede optimal dietary intake. However, evidence from military field studies is mixed, with supplementation often failing to improve protein balance or related physiological and performance outcomes under severe, multifactorial operational stress. These findings suggest that supplementation may be unnecessary in most real-world contexts and that overemphasis on protein could detract from the critical goal of achieving energy balance by consuming enough energy from mixed-macronutrient sources. This brief commentary reviews accessibility and drivers of heavy protein or amino acid supplement use by military personnel, including safety concerns and access to reliable education resources; contrasts laboratory randomized controlled efficacy trials with real-world effectiveness studies; and offers practical recommendations for supplemental intake during strenuous military operations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.