ReviewWorld journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery2026
Prognostic Value of Initial CT Imaging for Surgical Planning and Outcomes in Panfacial Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the reported prognostic value of initial computed tomography (CT) imaging for surgical planning and postoperative outcomes in panfacial fractures, and to determine whether CT-derived variables have been consistently linked to clinically relevant outcomes. Data Sources: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched from database inception to January 1, 2026. Eligible studies were restricted to publications from January 2015 onward. Methods: Studies were eligible if they included patients with panfacial fractures or separately extractable panfacial fracture subgroups, reported CT or imaging-based assessment for diagnosis or surgical planning, and provided extractable postoperative or surgical-management outcomes. Study characteristics, CT-related variables, surgical-planning data, and postoperative outcomes were extracted. Random-effects meta-analysis of single proportions was performed for infection, malocclusion, revision or secondary surgery, and enophthalmos. CT-derived prognostic evidence was synthesized narratively according to whether imaging variables were directly or indirectly linked to outcomes. Results: Sixteen studies involving 1811 patients were included. Pooled postoperative complication prevalences were 11% for infection (95% CI, 0%-90%), 10% for malocclusion (95% CI, 5%-19%), 2% for revision or secondary surgery (95% CI, 2%-4%), and 5% for enophthalmos (95% CI, 1%-21%). CT, multiplanar imaging, or three-dimensional reconstruction was frequently reported for fracture characterization and operative planning. However, standardized CT-derived prognostic variables were inconsistently reported, and few studies directly linked initial imaging findings to postoperative outcomes. Conclusion: Initial CT imaging is essential for assessment and surgical planning in panfacial fractures. Current evidence provides pooled postoperative benchmarks but remains insufficient to establish robust CT-based prognostic prediction. Standardized CT reporting, fracture-severity classification, and outcome assessment are needed to clarify whether initial imaging findings can predict surgical complexity and long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.