ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Immunotherapy of membranous nephropathy: strategic evolution from CD20 monoclonal antibodies to future vaccines.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Membranous nephropathy (MN) arises from autoantibody-mediated attack on podocyte antigens, with immune deposits forming subepithelially at the glomerular basement membrane to trigger complement activation and subsequent podocyte damage, eventually manifesting as proteinuria. Traditional therapy hinges on nonspecific immunosuppression, which is characterized by modest effectiveness and a substantial side-effect profile. In recent years, CD20-targeting monoclonal antibodies, most notably rituximab (RTX), have curtailed autoantibody production through peripheral B-cell depletion and consequently emerged as a first-line treatment option for patients at intermediate-to-high risk. However, a considerable proportion of patients still show no initial response or later relapse. Resistance mechanisms are heterogeneous, encompassing Fc receptor polymorphisms, plasma cell longevity, and anti-RTX antibody formation. To address these hurdles, novel biologics that target the BAFF/APRIL signaling axis, CD38-positive plasma cells, and the complement cascade have entered the clinical arena, further broadening the immunotherapeutic landscape for MN. In parallel, as our understanding of immune memory and autoantibody-generating cells continues to expand, a so-called "immune reset" approach is gaining traction, with its core rationale being the restoration of a robust yet self-tolerant immune system. This review charts the progression of MN therapies, from CD20 monoclonal antibodies and their optimized use, through novel biologics, to vaccine-based strategies that target autoantibody-specific B or T cells (including CAAR-T, Treg therapies, B-cell epitope vaccines, and T-cell vaccines). We further consider their theoretical promise for inducing antigen-specific immune tolerance and the barriers to clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.