ReviewFrontiers in drug delivery2026
Engineering the oxidative myocardium: ROS-responsive biomaterials for precision cardiovascular delivery in ischemia-reperfusion injury and post-infarction remodeling.
Review in Frontiers in drug delivery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (MIRI) and post-infarction remodeling are characterized by dynamic oxidative stress that varies across myocardial regions and disease stages. Reactive oxygen species (ROS)-responsive and redox-modulating biomaterials seek to exploit this environment through stimulus-triggered release or degradation, ROS scavenging, targeted delivery, local retention, and stage-specific repair. This review critically evaluates preclinical strategies for MIRI, myocardial infarction, and post-infarction remodeling. Major platform classes differ substantially in mechanism and translational feasibility: injectable hydrogels offer local retention and spatiotemporal control but often require invasive administration; systemic nanoparticles and liposomes enable tissue-, cell-, or organelle-level targeting but require stronger biodistribution and clearance data; nanozymes provide sustained catalytic redox activity but raise persistence and safety concerns; and cell-, nucleic-acid-, or gas-based systems introduce additional manufacturing and regulatory complexity. Mechanistically, redox interaction represents the initiating action, followed by proximal mitochondrial and cell-death regulation, inflammatory modulation, and later effects on angiogenesis, fibrosis, and ventricular remodeling. Although preclinical studies demonstrate cardioprotective and repair-promoting effects, direct cross-platform comparisons remain limited. Translation is constrained by heterogeneous models, inconsistent definitions of ROS responsiveness, incomplete pharmacokinetic and safety characterization, sparse large-animal validation, and limited manufacturing evidence. ROS-responsive cardiovascular biomaterials therefore remain promising but clinically unproven precision-delivery strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.