ReviewFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2026
Extracellular matrix and perineuronal nets in neural plasticity, memory, and epileptogenesis.
Review in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the mature brain, the extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules derived from neurons and glia accumulate in spatially distinct extracellular compartments, including a diffuse interstitial matrix and condensed perineuronal nets (PNNs), where they regulate receptor mobility, ion homeostasis, cell-surface signaling, structural stabilization, and experience-dependent synaptic remodeling. PNNs, in particular, assemble around selected neuronal populations - most prominently parvalbumin-positive fast-spiking interneurons - and thereby couple extracellular molecular architecture to inhibitory control, critical-period closure, and the long-term precision of network activity. These properties place ECM and PNNs at the intersection of developmental maturation, synaptic plasticity, memory-related stabilization, and pathological circuit remodeling. These principles are directly relevant to epilepsy. If ECM and PNNs normally stabilize synaptic organization, preserve inhibitory interneuron function, regulate extracellular space, and constrain maladaptive rewiring, then their disruption is positioned to lower the threshold for persistent hyperexcitability and aberrant network synchronization. For instance, hyaluronan deficiency alters neuronal activity and can produce seizures. However, the biological mechanisms and specific contributions of ECM and PNN in epilepsy still need to be further elucidated. Therefore, the purpose of the study is to systematically elaborate on the similarities and differences between ECM and PNN in terms of plasticity, memory, the biological mechanisms of neurological diseases, especially in the context of epilepsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.