Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42812843›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2026

Explainable Machine Learning for Predicting Global Malaria Incidence From 2000 to 2022 With Climatic and Extreme Weather Conditions Across 78 Endemic Countries: A Retrospective Ecological Study.

Md Abu Bokkor Shiddik, Md Abdullah Al Fahad Sohan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Md Abu Bokkor ShiddikDepartment of Statistics Begum Rokeya University Rangpur Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0424-446X
Md Abdullah Al Fahad SohanDepartment of Statistics Begum Rokeya University Rangpur Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3098-653X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Malaria remains a major global health concern, causing substantial morbidity and mortality, especially in tropical and subtropical regions with limited healthcare resources. Climatic conditions and extreme weather events are increasingly recognized as critical determinants of malaria transmission, yet their relative contributions remain poorly quantified. This study applied machine learning (ML) and explainable AI (XAI) to identify the key climatic and extreme weather determinants of malaria, assess their relative importance, and predict incidence. Methods: Malaria incidence was analyzed across 78 endemic countries (2000-2022) using climatic and extreme weather variables from the World Health Organization (WHO), the EM-DAT International Disaster Database, and the Global Data Lab. Random forest (RF) model was trained to predict malaria incidence, with performance assessed using the coefficient of determination ( Results: Malaria incidence declined steadily across the 78 endemic countries over the study period, remaining highest in Sub-Saharan Africa. Random forest achieved the best overall predictive performance for malaria incidence ( Conclusion: Random forest integrated with explainable AI provides an effective and interpretable framework for predicting malaria incidence and identifying its key climatic predictors, while quantifying the secondary contribution of extreme weather exposure. These findings can support evidence-based, climate-adaptive public health planning for malaria prevention and control.

Indexed as

climate variabilityexplainable AIextreme weathermachine learningmalaria

Identifiers

PMID42812843
PMCPMC13620412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.