Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42812770›Full record

ArticleOpen medicine (Warsaw, Poland)2026

Exogenous H

Qingjie Zhang, Jianfeng Lu, Zhenyong Gu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qingjie ZhangDepartment of Police, Guangdong Justice Police Vocational College, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0899-9486
Jianfeng LuDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou Medical University Affiliated Stomatological Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zhenyong GuDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Traumatic stress triggers systemic inflammation and organ injury via HMGB1 and endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS), but whether H Methods: Male SD rats underwent bilateral hindlimb crush. Sixty rats were assigned to sham, crush, NaHS pretreatment (14, 28, 56 μmol/kg), delayed NaHS (120 μmol/kg), and NaHS-only groups (n=6). Serum ALT/AST, histopathology, HMGB1 (ELISA/IHC), and ERS markers (GRP78, caspase-12, CHOP, IRE1α) were assessed. Results: Crush increased ALT/AST, liver/lung injury, plasma HMGB1, cytoplasmic HMGB1 translocation, and ERS activation. NaHS at 28 μmol/kg offered strongest protection, reducing all parameters. The 14 μmol/kg dose had limited effect; 56 μmol/kg showed reduced efficacy and mild toxicity. Delayed 120 μmol/kg also attenuated injury and HMGB1-ERS activation, though less effectively than 28 μmol/kg pretreatment. Conclusions: Exogenous H

Indexed as

endoplasmic reticulum stressHMGB1hydrogen sulfideliverlungrat

Identifiers

PMID42812770
PMCPMC13621876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.