Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42812769›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026

Innate immune dysregulation in celiac disease and refractory celiac disease: mechanisms, management and emerging therapies.

Sara Shaikh, Preeti Jain

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sara ShaikhDepartment of Life Sciences, Somaiya School of Basic and Applied Sciences, Somaiya Vidyavihar University, Mumbai, India.
Preeti JainDepartment of Life Sciences, Somaiya School of Basic and Applied Sciences, Somaiya Vidyavihar University, Mumbai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Celiac disease is traditionally regarded as T-cell mediated autoimmune disorder driven by gluten-specific adaptive immune responses. In this review, we synthesise recent data showing how epithelial stress, IL-15 driven innate circuits and intraepithelial lymphocyte reprogramming contribute to both classical and refractory disease. It affects 1-3% of people worldwide, caused by gluten intake in individuals carrying HLA-DQ2/DQ8 haplotypes. Gliadin peptides such as 33-mer and p31-43, resist digestion, trigger zonulin release through CXCR3, disrupt epithelial barrier and induce an innate immune response through oxidative stress, EGFR signalling, and trans presentation of IL-15. In refractory celiac disease, this reprograms intraepithelial lymphocytes into cytotoxic, NK-like effectors expressing NKG2D and NKp30. These target MICA/B stressed epithelium independently of adaptive immunity, maintaining villous atrophy despite a strict gluten-free diet. Type I RCD shows polyclonal surface CD3+/CD8+ IELs whereas type II shows clonal aberrant IELs lacking surface CD3 and hypersensitive to IL-15 due to JAK/STAT mutations leading to enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma. This circuit is strengthened by gut dysbiosis, viral triggers and epigenetic changes. Emerging therapies including budesonide, cladribine, IL-15/JAK inhibitors, nutraceuticals and microbiota modulation are assessed against this framework. The manuscript proposes viewing RCD as a failure of innate immune regulation rather than solely as an adaptive response.

Indexed as

Celiac DiseaseImmunity, InnateAnimalsDiet, Gluten-FreeHumansInterleukin-15Interleukin-15autoimmune disorderbarrier dysfunctionceliac diseaseinnate immune dysregulationinterleukin-15refractory celiac disease

Identifiers

PMID42812769
PMCPMC13620331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.