ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2026
Facial Morphology Assessment in Brazilian Children With Congenital Zika Virus Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Anthropometric Study.
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to conduct an anthropometric analysis of children with microcephaly caused by Zika virus infection and to compare results with those of a control group. Materials and Methods: The study included 12 children with congenital microcephaly (experimental group) and 15 normosystemic children (control group), all aged 4-5 years. Eight anthropometric facial points were marked to assess the upper, middle, and lower thirds of the face. Statistics: To assess normality, the Shapiro-Wilk test was used, followed by the Student's Results: Orofacial anthropometric measurements showed that upper lip measurements and upper-to-lower lip ratios were higher in the experimental group than in the control group; however, only upper lip variables showed statistically significant differences (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.