ArticleDEN open2027
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gallbladder Drainage as a Bridge to Surgery for Acute Cholecystitis: A Comparative Study.
Article in DEN open, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Gallbladder drainage is used for patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) who are unsuitable for emergency cholecystectomy. Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD), endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD), and endoscopic transpapillary GBD (ETGBD) are used as bridge-to-surgery (BTS) approaches, but comparative data are limited. We compared clinical and perioperative outcomes among these strategies. Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included 84 patients with AC who underwent GBD between January 2016 and January 2026 (PTGBD, Results: Technical success rates were 100% in the PTGBD and EUS-GBD groups and 73.7% in the ETGBD group ( Conclusions: All three approaches were feasible BTS strategies for AC. EUS-GBD achieved high technical and clinical success with acceptable safety. After successful BTS, surgical outcomes were broadly comparable among groups. Drainage strategy should be individualized based on patient conditions, anatomical feasibility, and circumstances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.