ReviewRSC advances2026
Artificial intelligence-driven monitoring and sustainable management of lithium-ion battery waste: integrating advanced sensing, environmental remediation, and circular resource recovery.
Review in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid growth of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is generating heterogeneous end-of-life streams that combine substantial resource value with fire, fluorochemical, and metal-contamination risks. This review critically examines how advanced sensing, artificial intelligence (AI), recycling chemistry, environmental remediation, and circular-resource strategies can be integrated across LIB waste management. Gas, thermal, electrochemical, spectroscopic, and imaging technologies are evaluated according to their monitoring targets and, where available, quantitative performance, with particular attention to HF and other fluorinated decomposition products. Evidence from primary AI studies is assessed using dataset origin and size, input variables, prediction targets, validation procedures, and reported performance rather than algorithm names alone. Hydrometallurgical recycling is examined mechanistically through reductive leaching, organic-acid chemistry, solvent extraction, and product recovery while distinguishing leaching efficiency from final material recovery and purity. Pyrometallurgy, direct recycling, bioleaching, and emerging solvent systems are compared without assuming a universally superior route. Importantly, recycling is distinguished from remediation of contaminants released to process water, soil, and gaseous streams. The resulting framework connects hazard detection, chemistry-aware sorting, data-driven process optimization, contaminant control, resource recovery, and digital traceability. Major limitations remain insufficient external validation of AI models, mixed-stream sensor calibration, inconsistent recovery metrics, feedstock variability, and limited industrial-scale evidence. Addressing these constraints is essential for developing genuinely safe, adaptive, and circular LIB waste-management systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.