Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42812694›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of women's health2026

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for predicting Major Obstetric Emergencies: Current Evidence, Clinical Translation, and Future Directions.

Behrang Rezvani Kakhki, Saboura Sahebi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Behrang Rezvani KakhkiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-3715-6618
Saboura SahebiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID 0009-0006-3656-6198

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Obstetric emergencies, including postpartum hemorrhage, preeclampsia, and preterm birth, remain major contributors to preventable maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Conventional risk assessment approaches often rely on predefined clinical variables and may insufficiently capture complex nonlinear relationships among maternal characteristics, biomarkers, imaging findings, and electronic health record data. Purpose: This narrative review aimed to synthesize current evidence on the application of artificial intelligence and machine learning for prediction and risk stratification in major obstetric emergencies. Methods: A structured narrative synthesis was conducted to summarize original studies evaluating AI- and ML-based models for postpartum hemorrhage, preeclampsia, and preterm birth. Evidence was reviewed according to target condition, algorithm type, predictor variables, model performance, validation strategy, interpretability, and clinical implementation relevance. Results: Machine-learning models, including random forest, support vector machine, neural networks, gradient boosting, LightGBM, and XGBoost, demonstrated promising discriminatory performance across selected cohorts. These models commonly incorporated maternal demographics, obstetric history, biomarkers, ultrasound parameters, and electronic health record variables. However, substantial heterogeneity in study design, predictors, outcome definitions, and performance reporting limited direct comparison. External validation, calibration assessment, explainability, and prospective evaluation were frequently insufficient. Conclusion: AI and ML may enhance early risk identification in obstetric emergencies, but current evidence remains insufficient for routine clinical implementation. Future studies should prioritize transparent reporting, multicenter validation, calibration, explainable modeling, and prospective assessment of clinical utility.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencemachine learningpostpartum hemorrhagepre-eclampsiapreterm birth

Identifiers

PMID42812694
PMCPMC13621557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.