Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42812666›Full record

ArticleAllergologie select2026

S2k-Guideline - Standardized application of the nasal and conjunctival provocation test on allergic diseases of the upper airways : of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO-KHC), German Dermatological Society (DDG), German Society of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (DGKJ), German Society of Ophthalmology (DOG), German Respiratory Society (DGP), German Society for Occupational and Environmental Medicine (DGAUM), German Society for Pediatric Allergology and Environmental Medicine (GPA), German Society for Pediatric Pulmonology (GPP), Ärzteverband Deutscher Allergologen (AeDA), and German Professional Association of Otorhinolaryngologists (BVHNO).

Ulrike Förster-Ruhrmann, Tobias Ankermann, Sven Becker, Petra Bubel, Mandy Cuevas, Moritz Gröger, Ludger Klimek, Lars Lange, Katrin Milger, Philip Maier and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Allergologie select, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Ulrike Förster-RuhrmannDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, CCM and CVK, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin.
Tobias AnkermannChildrens Hospital, Städtisches Krankenhaus Kiel gGmbH, Kiel.
Sven BeckerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center, Tübingen.
Petra BubelENT practice Dr. Bubel, Eisleben.
Mandy CuevasFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden.
Moritz GrögerDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich.
Ludger KlimekCenter for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden.
Lars LangeDepartment of Pediatrics, GFO-Kliniken Bonn, St. Marien-Hospital, Bonn.
Katrin MilgerDepartment of Medicine V, University Hospital of the Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Philip MaierEye Center, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg.
Norbert MuelleneisenAsthma-Allergiezentrum, Leverkusen.
Dennis NowakInstitute and Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, CPC (Comprehensive Pneumology Center) Munich, DZL, German Center for Lung Research, Munich.
Heidi OlzeDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, CCM and CVK, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin.
Uwe PleyerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Berlin.
Wolfgang SchlenterLangenselbold.
Sebastian SchmidtDepartment of Pediatrics, University Medicine, Greifswald.
Antje SchusterCenter for Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center, Düsseldorf.
Martin WagenmannDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Düsseldorf University Hospital (UKD), Düsseldorf.
Bettina WediDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, Comprehensive Allergy Center, Hanover Medical School, Hannover, and.
Oliver PfaarDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Rhinology and Allergy, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Broad evidence confirms that AR (ICD J30.3) is a chronic disease with high prevalence among children and adults worldwide. Its consequences, both from a public health perspective and at the level of the individual patient, are often underestimated, and the condition is inadequately treated. In addition, AR is often related to comorbidities with additional impact on diseases-severity. Allergen provocation of the easily accessible nasal (nasal allergen provocation test: NPT) or conjunctival mucosa (conjunctival allergen provocation test: CPT) reproduces the allergen-dependent, IgE-mediated allergic reaction under controlled and standardized conditions. These measures are regarded as the diagnostic gold standard, particularly in cases of unclear results in primary allergological tests, enabling clinically relevant identification of the causative allergen. Approved test allergens are critical for ensuring the methodological quality of the NPT. However, their availability is increasingly limited, although adequate quantities of allergen solutions remain indispensable for high-quality nasal allergen testing. Unilateral allergen provocation has been established in the clinical routine for decades in Germany. However, scientific evidence for unilateral application of the test allergen is pending. International position papers differ from this recommendation. The CPT is a simple, safe, and well-tolerated measure. It is primarily used in perennial and, in selected cases, seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. This method is less commonly applied for vernal keratoconjunctivitis and atopic keratoconjunctivitis. It is primarily used to confirm the underlying allergen, particularly when establishing the indication for allergen immunotherapy (AIT). It can also be employed to monitor treatment effects such as e.g., AIT or pharmacotherapy. Although highly sensitive, the procedure of nasal ASA provocation remains a time-consuming procedure. While challenging in children, NPT provides clinically relevant additional diagnostic information on the causes of the allergic symptoms. Allergological diagnostic work-up also includes pulmonary assessment, particularly in patients with established asthma or symptoms suggestive of asthma. Both AAR and PNIF are applied as standard procedures for assessing the outcome of NPT in Germany. In individual cases, other rhinometric methods may also be used.

Indexed as

allergic rhinitisconjunctival allergen provocation testidentification causative allergennasal allergen provocation testPNIFrhinomanometer

Identifiers

PMID42812666
PMCPMC13621271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.