ArticleAllergologie select2026
S2k-Guideline - Standardized application of the nasal and conjunctival provocation test on allergic diseases of the upper airways : of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO-KHC), German Dermatological Society (DDG), German Society of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (DGKJ), German Society of Ophthalmology (DOG), German Respiratory Society (DGP), German Society for Occupational and Environmental Medicine (DGAUM), German Society for Pediatric Allergology and Environmental Medicine (GPA), German Society for Pediatric Pulmonology (GPP), Ärzteverband Deutscher Allergologen (AeDA), and German Professional Association of Otorhinolaryngologists (BVHNO).
Article in Allergologie select, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Broad evidence confirms that AR (ICD J30.3) is a chronic disease with high prevalence among children and adults worldwide. Its consequences, both from a public health perspective and at the level of the individual patient, are often underestimated, and the condition is inadequately treated. In addition, AR is often related to comorbidities with additional impact on diseases-severity. Allergen provocation of the easily accessible nasal (nasal allergen provocation test: NPT) or conjunctival mucosa (conjunctival allergen provocation test: CPT) reproduces the allergen-dependent, IgE-mediated allergic reaction under controlled and standardized conditions. These measures are regarded as the diagnostic gold standard, particularly in cases of unclear results in primary allergological tests, enabling clinically relevant identification of the causative allergen. Approved test allergens are critical for ensuring the methodological quality of the NPT. However, their availability is increasingly limited, although adequate quantities of allergen solutions remain indispensable for high-quality nasal allergen testing. Unilateral allergen provocation has been established in the clinical routine for decades in Germany. However, scientific evidence for unilateral application of the test allergen is pending. International position papers differ from this recommendation. The CPT is a simple, safe, and well-tolerated measure. It is primarily used in perennial and, in selected cases, seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. This method is less commonly applied for vernal keratoconjunctivitis and atopic keratoconjunctivitis. It is primarily used to confirm the underlying allergen, particularly when establishing the indication for allergen immunotherapy (AIT). It can also be employed to monitor treatment effects such as e.g., AIT or pharmacotherapy. Although highly sensitive, the procedure of nasal ASA provocation remains a time-consuming procedure. While challenging in children, NPT provides clinically relevant additional diagnostic information on the causes of the allergic symptoms. Allergological diagnostic work-up also includes pulmonary assessment, particularly in patients with established asthma or symptoms suggestive of asthma. Both AAR and PNIF are applied as standard procedures for assessing the outcome of NPT in Germany. In individual cases, other rhinometric methods may also be used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.