ReviewFrontiers in aging neuroscience2026
TREM2-directed therapy in Alzheimer's disease: from therapeutic window to clinical translation.
Review in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by amyloid-β (Aβ) deposition, tau pathology, synaptic dysfunction, and a sustained neuroimmune response. Among immune-related targets, triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) is of particular interest because it is supported by human genetics, microglial biology, and expanding therapeutic development. TREM2 regulates microglial survival, phagocytosis, lipid handling, metabolic fitness, and plaque-associated responses, yet its therapeutic significance is more complex than a simple protective receptor model suggests. Although multiple TREM2-directed strategies have entered preclinical and early clinical development, recent evidence indicates that pharmacological target engagement does not necessarily translate into clinical benefit. We therefore propose that the therapeutic value of TREM2 is best understood through the concept of therapeutic window. TREM2 modulation is more likely to be beneficial when amyloid pathology is still being actively contained and microglial functional reserve remains preserved, whereas later disease stages, tau-associated neurodegeneration, receptor shedding, genetic heterogeneity, and pre-existing immune dysfunction may narrow or alter treatment benefit. Within this framework, soluble TREM2 (sTREM2) should be interpreted cautiously, as it may reflect receptor shedding, target engagement, microglial state, disease stage, or a combination of these processes rather than serving as a direct surrogate of efficacy. Viewed in this way, the central challenge of TREM2-directed therapy is to determine both when receptor modulation can still produce meaningful tissue protection and how the mode of receptor engagement shapes adaptive or maladaptive microglial programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.