Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42812601›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Development and external validation of an explainable XGBoost model with a web-based calculator for risk prediction of postpartum depressive symptoms.

Qian Zhang, Fang Wu, Mei Zhu, Liwei Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qian Zhang *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Second People's Hospital of Bengbu City, Bengbu, China.
Fang Wu *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital of Huainan Oriental Hospital Group, Huainan, China.
Mei ZhuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Second People's Hospital of Bengbu City, Bengbu, China.
Liwei SunDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Second People's Hospital of Bengbu City, Bengbu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Postpartum depression (PPD) is associated with severe adverse outcomes, yet timely risk stratification remains challenging. Existing machine learning models are often limited by insufficient external validation, limited interpretability, and lack of accessible clinical tools. This study aimed to develop and externally validate an explainable machine learning model with a web-based calculator for predicting postpartum depressive symptoms. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 553 women from two hospitals, comprising 403 in the development cohort and 150 in an independent external validation cohort. The development cohort was divided into training and internal test sets. Screening-positive postpartum depressive symptoms at 6 weeks postpartum were defined as an Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) score ≥9. Five machine learning models were developed using demographic, psychosocial, and obstetric predictors. Model discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with calibration and decision curve analyses performed additionally. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used for model interpretation. Results: Screening-positive rates were 38.0% in the development cohort and 26.0% in the external validation cohort. Tree-based ensemble models showed broadly comparable performance. eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) was selected based on its numerically highest mean cross-validated AUC and balanced overall performance, with AUCs of 0.895 ± 0.033 in cross-validation, 0.845 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.751-0.940) in the internal test set, and 0.820 (95% CI: 0.743-0.889) in the external validation cohort. Calibration was acceptable in the internal test set, whereas absolute risk was overestimated in the external validation cohort. Decision curve analysis indicated potential net clinical benefit. SHAP identified age, marital relationship quality, prenatal depressive symptoms, monthly personal income, and sleep disturbance as important model-based contributors. A four-predictor web calculator was developed. Discussion: The explainable XGBoost model showed promising discrimination for predicting EPDS-defined postpartum depressive symptoms. However, given the modest external validation sample and evidence of risk overestimation, further prospective multicenter validation and recalibration are needed before routine clinical implementation.

Indexed as

machine learningmodel interpretabilitypostpartum depressionweb-based calculatorXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID42812601
PMCPMC13619944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.