ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Immunosuppression as an associated risk factor for high-grade cervical lesions: a comparative study of cytology, HPV, and histopathology.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Persistent high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) infection is the main cause of cervical carcinogenesis, and impaired immune surveillance may increase the risk of viral persistence and progression to high-grade lesions. This study aimed to evaluate the association between immunosuppression and high-grade cervical lesions (CIN2+) and to examine its association with HPV status, cytological findings, and histopathological outcomes. Methods: This retrospective comparative cohort study included women evaluated with cervical cytology, HPV testing, colposcopy, and/or histopathology between 2019 and 2024 at two participating centers. After exclusions, 370 women were analyzed, including 313 immunocompetent controls and 57 immunosuppressed patients. HIV-infected women were excluded. The primary outcome was CIN2 + . Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate associations with high-grade cervical disease. Results: Overall HPV positivity was similar between groups, but immunosuppressed women had a significantly higher prevalence of hrHPV infection. Endocervical curettage (ECC) was performed more frequently in the immunosuppressed group, and ECC positivity was also higher. Final histopathology showed fewer normal findings in immunosuppressed women, with numerically higher rates of CIN2, CIN3, and cancer. In multivariable analysis, immunosuppression remained associated with CIN2 + after adjustment (adjusted OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.0-3.0, Conclusion: Immunosuppression was associated with a higher risk of high-grade cervical lesions and a less favorable cervical disease profile, supporting closer surveillance in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.