Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42812534›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2026

Species Extinction Curves Under Emergent Spatiotemporal Land-Use Processes and the Role of Protected Areas.

Nao Takashina, Buntarou Kusumoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nao TakashinaGraduate School of Frontier Sciences The University of Tokyo Kashiwa Chiba Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9594-9264
Buntarou KusumotoFaculty of Agriculture Kyushu University Kasuya Fukuoka Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthropogenic land-use change is a major driver of biodiversity loss. Predicting the resulting extinction risk is essential for balancing development and conservation, yet remains challenging due to the lack of frameworks that integrate dynamic human activity with species' spatial distributions. In this study, we develop a spatially explicit model that couples land-use progression with species range-size distributions to estimate species extinctions. This framework captures the stochastic emergence, spatial expansion, and merging of converted areas over time, while accounting for species' spatial range structure. We use it to compare extinction risk across land-use dynamics, geographic gradients, and protected-area implementation scenarios. Using endemic-area relationships (EARs) to evaluate immediate species loss, we found that frequent emergence of new, spatially dispersed land-use patches shifted species loss toward later stages of habitat conversion, producing a sharper increase than in scenarios assuming expansion from a single location. However, because multi-site conversion also accelerates land conversion in time, this conversion pattern may pose a greater real-time risk to biodiversity. We also investigate the role of protected areas, finding that earlier implementation can significantly reduce extinctions, although the effectiveness varies depending on land-use patterns. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating spatiotemporal land-use processes into extinction models and emphasize the urgency of timely conservation strategies to mitigate biodiversity loss.

Indexed as

biodiversity conservationendemics‐area relationshipextinction debtprotected areasspecies‐area relationship

Identifiers

PMID42812534
PMCPMC13620222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.