ArticleJournal of rheumatic diseases2026
Characterising axial psoriatic arthritis in clinical practice: a retrospective analysis from the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Registry.
Article in Journal of rheumatic diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To determine the proportion of axial psoriatic arthritis (axPsA), describe how it is diagnosed in clinical practice, and identify clinical and demographic characteristics independently associated with axPsA. Methods: A multicentre retrospective observational study was conducted using data from patients registered in the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Registry (Reuma.pt) with a diagnosis of PsA or spondyloarthritis with psoriasis. Peripheral involvement was defined as the presence of peripheral joint disease. Axial involvement was defined by the presence of physician-reported spondylitis and/or imaging findings suggestive of axial disease. Patients were divided into four non-exclusive groups axPsA, axial involvement with or without peripheral joint disease; ax-PsA_only, axial involvement exclusively; peripheral PsA (pPsA)_only, peripheral joint disease, without axial involvement; pPsA, peripheral joint disease with or without axial disease. Results: This study included 2,304 patients. axPsA was present in 37.1% of patients and axPsA_only in 8.1%. The diagnosis was made based on suggestive imaging findings in 30.1%, and on physician judgement in 69.9%. axPsA was independently associated with HLA-B27 positivity (odds ratio [OR]=2.90; p<0.001), enthesitis (OR=1.64; p<0.001), and younger age at symptom onset (OR=0.97; p<0.001); pPsA_only with dactylitis (OR=1.89; p<0.001) and nail dystrophy (OR=1.42; p=0.010). axPsA_only was independently associated HLA-B27 positivity (OR=3.35; p<0.001) and uveitis (OR=2.56; p=0.004); pPsA with nail dystrophy (OR=2.11; p=0.002), dactylitis (OR=18.18; p<0.001), and enthesitis (OR=1.74; p=0.031). Conclusion: Axial involvement is present in over one-third of PsA patients, often in association with peripheral joint disease. axPsA patients demonstrate distinct clinical and demographic characteristics compared to those without axial disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.