ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
An upstream approach to veterinary workforce wellbeing: an evaluative review of an embedded wellbeing curriculum in veterinary education.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Veterinary professionals work in demanding environments shaped by individual, relational, organizational, and systemic pressures. Veterinary education can therefore serve as an upstream setting for developing both clinical competence and the capabilities needed for sustainable professional engagement and wellbeing. Competency-based veterinary education offers a structure for treating wellbeing as a professional capability that can be taught, practiced, assessed, and evaluated. This study reports an evaluative review of a longitudinal wellbeing curriculum embedded within the Doctor of Veterinary Medicine program at the Melbourne Veterinary School. Data sources included curriculum documents, curriculum mapping, two non-participant teaching observations, and collaborative interpretation by veterinary education and wellbeing science experts. AAVMC CBVE® 2.0 and the Wellbeing Integrated Learning Design framework served as evaluative lenses. The review examined how wellbeing science was integrated across the formal curriculum and identified priorities for strengthening alignment, delivery, assessment, and evaluation. The intended learning outcomes were conceptually appropriate, developmentally sequenced, and aligned most strongly with CBVE® Domain 7. However, constructive alignment with assessment was incomplete. Opportunities for applied practice and feedback were limited, no explicit formal wellbeing curriculum was present in the final clinical year, and links among wellbeing, communication, and systems-level contributors were infrequent. Priorities included greater vertical integration, intentional learning design, applied professional practice, formative reflection, educator development, and longitudinal evaluation. Because systematic student and educator feedback was not collected, the findings describe the formal curriculum but do not establish how it was experienced or whether it improved learner outcomes. The study offers an adaptable process for reviewing, refining, and evaluating embedded wellbeing curricula within existing veterinary education structures from a systems-informed perspective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.