ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Impact of coping profiles on social identity in a youth chronic pain recommender system: qualitative descriptive study.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic pain affects one in five children and adolescents worldwide yet remains one of the most underrecognized and undertreated illnesses, emphasizing the need for accessible, personalized digital health support. The Power over Pain portal delivers such support through a virtual stepped-care pathway, but like many digital interventions, is vulnerable to declining user engagement over time. Health recommender systems (HRSs) can personalize resource delivery and combat "choice overload," thereby encouraging sustained use. This study investigates the application of a health recommender system (HRS) as a way of increasing engagement with relevant virtual care resources for pediatric chronic pain. The perceived value of the HRS was evaluated through a qualitative descriptive study involving ten participants diagnosed with chronic pain. Results: Thematic analysis revealed four main themes: (1) HRS serves as a catalyst for important dialogue in routine care; (2) coping results from the HRS are selectively applied by users according to their needs; (3) the HRS creates a personable experience, positively influencing willingness to engage in care; (4) interacting with the HRS may affirm participants' social identities, fostering a sense of belonging in the pain community and potentially enhancing long-term resource engagement. Conclusion: These findings challenge the traditional focus on recommendation accuracy alone, suggesting instead that the effectiveness of an HRS may also be influenced by design features that support validation, shared experience, and potential social identification, which can deepen engagement and promote involvement in care. Future work should investigate the impact of mechanisms that reinforce users' social identities to understand their effects on sustained use and self-management behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.