Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42812359›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026

Neural encoding of auditory processing in schizophrenia.

Lakshma Reddy Vuyyuru, Anitha Raju

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lakshma Reddy VuyyuruDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Vaddeswaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Anitha RajuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Vaddeswaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Auditory processing abnormalities are a core feature of schizophrenia and are linked to deficits in speech perception, cognitive function, and everyday communication. It remains unclear which stages of auditory processing are most disrupted and how these disruptions relate to symptoms at the level of population-wide neural representations. Methods: We used fMRI recordings acquired while individuals with schizophrenia and matched healthy controls completed a controlled block-design speech-perception task. Voxel-wise encoding models mapped self-supervised speech-model representations, together with complementary acoustic and linguistic features, to neural responses. Results: Across cross-validated evaluations, individuals with schizophrenia showed numerically higher encoding alignment than matched controls across all evaluated regions of interest, although no effect survived false discovery rate correction in this small sample. The largest numerical group differences occurred in frontal language regions, including the middle frontal gyrus and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, and in early auditory cortex. Subgroup analyses suggested that patients without auditory verbal hallucinations drove much of this numerical separation. Discussion: These descriptive, hypothesis-generating findings suggest that model-based encoding can reveal a frontal-auditory signature in schizophrenia, but they do not establish a clinically actionable biomarker or preserved or enhanced speech encoding. Larger, adequately powered studies with richer feature spaces are needed for confirmatory inference and to test whether encoding-based measures can serve as clinically meaningful biomarkers.

Indexed as

auditory cortexbrain encodingfMRIlanguageschizophreniaspeech modelsvoxel-wise models

Identifiers

PMID42812359
PMCPMC13619899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.