ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
An interpretable computational phenotyping pipeline for adult autism using routine electronic health records.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Electronic health records (EHRs) provide new opportunities for computational phenotyping in mental health, but routinely collected diagnostic data are often sparse, heterogeneous, and challenging to interpret. While numerous computational approaches have been applied to identify patient subgroups, clinically useful phenotyping requires workflows capable of transforming routine diagnostic information into interpretable patient profiles. The goal of this work is to develop and evaluate an end-to-end computational phenotyping pipeline for routine ICD-10 diagnostic data and demonstrate its feasibility in adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using routine EHR data from adults with ASD receiving care at a specialized mental health service. ICD-10 diagnoses were extracted, aggregated into clinically meaningful diagnostic categories, and transformed into binary patient-level representations. A self-organizing map (SOM) was used to organize patients according to diagnostic similarity, followed by hierarchical clustering to identify phenotype groups. Cluster solutions were evaluated using internal validity metrics, cluster size distributions, and interpretability. The resulting phenotypes were identified through diagnostic prevalence profiles and SOM-based visualizations. Results: The study included 927 adults with ASD, of whom 744 presented at least one comorbid diagnostic category and were included in the computational phenotyping analysis. The proposed pipeline identified four phenotypes characterized by distinct patterns of psychiatric and developmental comorbidity. The SOM structure provided an interpretable visualization of the diagnostic landscape, while hierarchical clustering enabled the identification of coherent phenotype groups. Internal validation metrics supported the selected solution while preserving informative subgroup sizes. Discussion: This study presents an end-to-end computational phenotyping pipeline that transforms routinely collected psychiatric EHR data into interpretable patient phenotypes. By integrating diagnostic extraction, clinically informed aggregation, representation learning, clustering, visualization, and characterization, the workflow provides a practical framework for analyzing complex diagnostic data in real-world mental health settings. Future studies should evaluate its applicability across other psychiatric and neurodevelopmental populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.