ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Haematological toxicity associated with antineoplastic drugs: a pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FDA adverse event reporting system database.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Antineoplastic drugs are effective for malignant tumours, but they frequently cause severe adverse drug reactions (ADRs), which seriously affect treatment continuity and patient prognosis. Post - marketing real - world safety monitoring is therefore critical. Methods: We conducted a retrospective pharmacovigilance study using FAERS (FDA Adverse Event Reporting System) data covering the period from 2004 Q1 to 2025 Q4. Safety signals were detected via disproportionate analysis, and associations were identified through LASSO and multivariable logistic regression, followed by an analysis of time to onset (TTO) for haematotoxicity. Results: A total of 347, 248 reports involving 367 antitumour drugs were analysed. Female patients (46.51%) outnumbered males (38.73%), with a median age of 59 years; patients aged 18 - 64.9 years represented 34.79% of the cohort. Fatal or life - threatening events were recorded in 78, 824 cases (22.70%). The leading drugs by report frequency were lenalidomide (ROR (Reporting Odds Ratio) = 1.51), methotrexate (ROR = 2.98), and rituximab (ROR = 3.69). Most events (61.65%) emerged within the first month, and median TTO differ significantly by sex. Furthermore, WSP analysis revealed that 26 of the top 30 drugs followed an early failure pattern. Conclusions: Our findings reveal a strong signal of haematological toxicity associated with antitumour agents, supporting enhanced routine monitoring to mitigate clinical risks. Nevertheless, confirmation through pharmacoepidemiological studies with rigorous causality assessment is required, owing to the inherent limitations of the FAERS spontaneous reporting system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.