Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42812193›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Who regulates when told? A systematic investigation of implicit to explicit emotion regulation.

Julia R Richmond, K Maria Nylocks, Karin G Coifman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julia R RichmondSchool of Psychology, Xavier University, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
K Maria NylocksSchool of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Karin G CoifmanDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Emotion regulation is a significant area of psychological research that requires investigation of processes that are often difficult for participants to describe, involving implicit and automatic actions. However, research examining emotion regulatory processes often requires individuals to modify their emotional responses in the moment and to report on that strategy use. We aimed to determine if individuals are able to change the regulation of their emotions when implicit goals are made explicit. Method: Undergraduates ( Results: Results suggested little difference in emotion response output following emotion regulation education and strategy reports and that individuals higher in trait negative affectivity were least responsive. Discussion: Hence, individuals may struggle to respond when implicit regulatory goals become explicit. This has implications for future research, but also for interventions that commonly rely on explicit emotion regulation goals and processes.

Indexed as

emotionemotion regulationfacial expressionnegative affectivityneuroticism

Identifiers

PMID42812193
PMCPMC13619395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.