ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Injury mechanisms and occurrence locations among hospital-recorded cases in Lanshan District, Linyi, China, 2021-2025.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To describe the distribution of injury mechanisms and occurrence locations among hospital-recorded injury cases and assess their associations with recorded demographic and contextual characteristics. Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed routinely collected injury-surveillance records from 22 reporting units in Lanshan District, Linyi, China. Records from 2021 through 25 November 2025 were eligible. After excluding four records with sex coded as unknown/other, one structurally malformed record, and one exact duplicate, 68,311 records remained. Mechanism and occurrence location were classified into seven and eight mutually exclusive categories, respectively. Multinomial logistic regression estimated relative risk ratios (RRRs) for category comparisons, adjusted for sex, age, occupation, calendar year, season, injury intent, and documented alcohol and psychotropic-substance status. Leave-one-reporting-unit-out analyses assessed the stability of the main comparisons. Modified Poisson models with reporting-unit-clustered standard errors and Cramer's Results: Males contributed 40,433 records (59.19%). Blunt injuries were the most common mechanism (52,468; 76.81%); residences (29,529; 43.23%), roads/streets (22,346; 32.71%), and industrial/construction locations (10,829; 15.85%) were the most common locations. The principal demographic comparisons were broadly consistent across reporting-unit deletion analyses. Males had higher sharp-versus-blunt (RRR 2.02, 95% CI 1.45-2.82) and industrial/construction-versus-residence RRRs (RRR 2.68, 95% CI 2.27-3.18), and a lower road/street-versus-residence RRR (RRR 0.87, 95% CI 0.83-0.92). Compared with adults aged 35-64 years, those aged 15-34 years had higher sharp-versus-blunt (RRR 1.61, 95% CI 1.02-2.53) and road/street-versus-residence RRRs (RRR 1.41, 95% CI 1.16-1.70). Alcohol and psychotropic-substance estimates were imprecise and sensitive to reporting-unit removal. Conclusion: Sex and age were associated with the composition of mechanisms and locations among hospital-recorded injury cases. The findings describe the surveillance case series and do not estimate population incidence or causal effects. Behavioral indicators should be interpreted as exploratory because positive records were sparse and disproportionately concentrated in the largest reporting unit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.