Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42812182›Full record

ArticleArXiv2026

Data augmentation as a framework for modeling hippocampal contributions to generalization.

Tyler Bonnen, Andrew Kyle Lampinen

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tyler BonnenUniversity of Pennsylvania.
Andrew Kyle LampinenAnthropic.

Funding

Biologically Plausible Computational Models of Perirhinal CortexF99NS125816 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BONNEN, TYLER · 2022 to 2022
$41k
NINDS NIH HHS F99 NS125816
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hippocampus plays a critical role in generalization, enabling us to flexibly repurpose prior experiences to perform novel tasks. Here we suggest that data augmentation-a machine learning strategy to improve generalization by refactoring prior experience-offers a useful framework to conceptualize and model hippocampal function. We begin by outlining how data augmentation operates across two timescales: the traditional "offline" setting, where refactoring training data yields more general representations, and an "online" setting, where retrieved experiences can be flexibly refactored at test time to support zero-shot inference. We suggest that these 'offline' and 'online' computational strategies map onto functions supported by the hippocampus. Critically, we argue that these computational tools can be leveraged to develop formal 'linking functions' between experimental evidence and theoretical claims, such that a unified modeling approach can be used to predict the diverse behaviors that depend on the hippocampus-from navigating in high-dimensional sensory environments to more abstract inferences. We hope this perspective, and the modeling strategies it makes available, will support new efforts to formalize and evaluate theories of hippocampal function.

Identifiers

PMID42812182
PMCPMC13618429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.