ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
Understanding and Designing Phase Change Materials: Insights From Atom Probe Tomography.
Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phase Change Materials (PCMs) can be rapidly and reversibly switched between their amorphous and crystalline state; a transition that is accompanied by a pronounced change of optoelectronic properties. Here, progress is reviewed to explain these property changes, focusing on advances by atom probe tomography (APT). This technique classifies bonding by providing two crucial bonding descriptors. Most important is the Probability of Multiple Events (PME), which is related to the likelihood that more than one ion is dislodged per successful laser pulse in laser-assisted field evaporation. Crystalline PCMs are characterized by a PME above 55%, not found for metals or iono-covalent solids. This confirms that crystalline PCMs employ a unique bonding mechanism coined metavalent bonding (MVB). While crystalline PCMs employ MVB, amorphous PCMs behave as covalent solids characterized by a much lower PME. PCMs thus change their bonding upon crystallization, consistent with quantum-chemical calculations of bonding. Crystalline solids with a high PME lie in a narrow conductivity range between metals and iono-covalent solids, indicative for a competition between electron localization and delocalization. A map quantifying chemical bonding locates metavalent solids in a region where approximately one electron is shared between adjacent atoms and bonding is not too ionic. This quantum chemical bonding map is now used to find and explain property trends relevant for PCMs in various application domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.