ArticleCancer medicine2026
Optimizing the ER Cutoff in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: ER ≥ 50% Predicts Low pCR Rates and Resistance to Antibody-Drug Conjugates in the Neoadjuvant Setting.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEstrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-positive breast cancer demonstrates significantly lower rates of pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant HER2-targeted therapies compared to ER-negative/HER2-positive disease. However, the optimal ER positivity cutoff for clinically meaningful patient stratification remains undefined.
methodsWe analyzed a retrospective cohort of 741 HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus dual HER2 blockade (trastuzumab and pertuzumab) at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. The optimal ER cutoff for predicting pCR was determined by ROC analysis with Youden index and validated by bootstrap resampling (1000 iterations). Transcriptomic data from TCGA and SCAN-B cohorts were analyzed to characterize biological differences between ER subgroups. Drug response was predicted using the oncoPredict algorithm, and cancer dependency was assessed using DepMap CRISPR screening data.
resultsER ≥ 50% positivity was identified as the optimal predictive cutoff (bootstrap 95% CI: 25.0%-77.5%) and was an independent predictor of significantly lower pCR rates in multivariate analysis (OR = 0.27; 95% CI: 0.19-0.40; p < 0.001). Transcriptomic analysis revealed that ER ≥ 50% tumors are characterized by activated estrogen response signaling, downregulated cell cycle and immune pathways. Predicted resistance to trastuzumab, T-DM1, and T-DXd was consistently enriched in this subgroup, consistent with lower HER2 and CD16A expression observed in ER ≥ 50% tumors. CCND1, a canonical transcriptional target of ESR1, was significantly upregulated in ER ≥ 50% tumors across both cohorts, and ER + /HER2 + cell lines exhibited significantly higher CCND1 and CDK4 dependency scores in DepMap CRISPR screening (p < 0.05), supporting activation of the ESR1-CCND1-CDK4/6 axis in this subgroup.
conclusionsER ≥ 50% positivity defines a clinically and biologically distinct HER2-positive subgroup with poor response to standard neoadjuvant therapy and predicted resistance to ADCs, consistent with lower HER2 and CD16A expression in this subgroup. The convergent transcriptomic and functional evidence for ESR1-CCND1 axis activation provides mechanistic support for combining CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine and anti-HER2 therapies to improve outcomes in this resistant subgroup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.