Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42811733›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2026

Sociodemographic and Dog-Management Factors Associated With Free-Roaming Dogs in Nigeria and Sierra Leone.

Philip P Mshelbwala, J Scott Weese, Tasneem Imam, Harish K Tiwari, Roland Suluku, Charles E Rupprecht

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Philip P MshelbwalaDepartment of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Orange, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6834-1456
J Scott WeeseDepartment of Pathobiology, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada, uoguelph.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1896-1937
Tasneem ImamSchool of Veterinary Sciences, University of Queensland, Gatton, Australia, uq.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6568-3971
Harish K TiwariJyoti and Bhupat Mehta School of Health Science and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, India, iitg.ac.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2911-9895
Roland SulukuNjala University, Bo, Sierra Leone, njala.edu.sl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7630-2484
Charles E RupprechtCollege of Forestry, Wildlife and Environment, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA, auburn.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Free-roaming dogs (FRDs) pose a persistent challenge to canine rabies elimination in low- and middle-income countries, as conventional vaccination strategies often struggle to reach this population, which increases the risk of dog bites, rabies virus exposure and traffic accidents and complicates rabies control efforts. We conducted cross-sectional surveys in Nigeria and Sierra Leone and fitted country-specific probabilistic models to identify factors associated with FRD ownership. The proportion of FRDs was higher in Sierra Leone (78.7%; 95% CI: 77.1-80.3) than in Nigeria (58.5%; 95% CI: 58.2-61.2). In both countries, significant interactions between locality (urban versus rural), education level, access to veterinary services and dog vaccination status influenced FRD ownership. The probability of FRD ownership was higher among respondents with no formal education, particularly those living in rural areas with no access, or uncertain access, to veterinary services. In Nigeria, FRD ownership increased with household poverty. In Sierra Leone, it was highest in low-density rural areas, declined sharply with increasing population density and decreased with distance from roads. The interaction between literacy and primary education was associated with reduced FRD ownership, although neither variable was significant when considered independently. In both countries, owners with good rabies knowledge and owners of indigenous, rather than mixed-breed, dogs were more likely to own FRDs. Spatial variation in FRD ownership was evident in both countries. In Nigeria, dog owners in Kaduna and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) were less likely to own FRDs than those in Anambra and Enugu. In Sierra Leone, the probability of FRD ownership was substantially higher in northern than in southern regions. Based on human-to-dog ratios of 2.77:1 in Nigeria and 2.75:1 in Sierra Leone, we estimated dog populations of ~11.7-12.7 million and 666,000, respectively. These findings highlight the need for targeted public education on responsible dog ownership and effective dog management, alongside community-level interventions in rural and other high-risk areas to reduce FRD populations. The resulting population estimates provide valuable evidence for planning and implementing mass canine rabies vaccination programs in both countries.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesRabiesAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesDogsFemaleHumansNigeriaOwnershipRabies VaccinesSierra LeoneSociodemographic FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsVaccinationRabies Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID42811733
PMCPMC13624544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.