ArticleJournal of nursing management2026
TeamSTEPPS Teamwork and Nurses' Vigilance in Critical Care: A Cross-Sectional Correlational Study.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo examine the association between perceived TeamSTEPPS teamwork and nurses' vigilance among critical care nurses and to determine whether overall perceived teamwork statistically predicts nurses' vigilance.
backgroundVigilance is essential in critical care settings, where nurses must continuously monitor patients and rapidly identify clinical deterioration. Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) is an evidence-based framework that strengthens teamwork through communication, leadership, situation monitoring, mutual support, and team structure. However, evidence regarding its influence on nurses' vigilance in critical care environments remains limited.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional descriptive correlational study in accordance with the STROBE guidelines across 24 critical care units at Tanta University Main Hospital. A total of 306 critical care nurses participated. We collected data using a demographic questionnaire, the TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ), and the Nursing Vigilance Scale (NVS). Descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation, and simple linear regression analyses were performed using IBM SPSS version 26.0.
resultsOverall TeamSTEPPS teamwork was strongly and positively correlated with nurses' vigilance (r = 0.731, p < 0.001). All TeamSTEPPS dimensions demonstrated significant positive associations with vigilance. Among the teamwork dimensions, situation monitoring (r = 0.659) and leadership (r = 0.648) exhibited the most robust correlations with overall vigilance, while communication recorded the lowest mean percentage score among the teamwork domains.
conclusionTeamSTEPPS teamwork was significantly and positively associated with vigilance in critical care settings and was a significant predictor of vigilance scores in the regression model. Due to the cross-sectional nature of the design, these results should be interpreted as statistical associations rather than causal effects. Since teamwork competencies are important for clinical work, further research is needed to explore causal relationships between teamwork competencies, proactive patient monitoring, and patient safety, including longitudinal and intervention studies. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Nursing managers should prioritize strengthening teamwork practices and teamwork-related competencies to improve communication, mutual support, and situational awareness among critical nurses, thereby enhancing vigilance and overall patient safety outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.