Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42811585›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing management2026

TeamSTEPPS Teamwork and Nurses' Vigilance in Critical Care: A Cross-Sectional Correlational Study.

Amal Diab Ghanem Atalla, Ibrahim Alasqah, Amira M Ali, Marwa S Sorour, Nada Alqarawi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amal Diab Ghanem AtallaDepartment of Nursing Administration, Faculty of Nursing, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt, alexu.edu.eg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8903-1601
Ibrahim AlasqahDepartment of Community, Psychiatric, and Mental Health Nursing, College of Nursing, Qassim University, Buraydah 52571, Saudi Arabia, qu.edu.sa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0316-1374
Amira M AliDepartment of Psychiatric Nursing and Mental Health, Faculty of Nursing, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt, alexu.edu.eg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6448-8282
Marwa S SorourDepartment of Nursing Administration, Faculty of Nursing, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt, tanta.edu.eg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8051-9157
Nada AlqarawiDepartment of Community, Psychiatric, and Mental Health Nursing, College of Nursing, Qassim University, Buraydah 52571, Saudi Arabia, qu.edu.sa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1814-2248

Funding

Qassim University QU-APC-2026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo examine the association between perceived TeamSTEPPS teamwork and nurses' vigilance among critical care nurses and to determine whether overall perceived teamwork statistically predicts nurses' vigilance.

backgroundVigilance is essential in critical care settings, where nurses must continuously monitor patients and rapidly identify clinical deterioration. Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) is an evidence-based framework that strengthens teamwork through communication, leadership, situation monitoring, mutual support, and team structure. However, evidence regarding its influence on nurses' vigilance in critical care environments remains limited.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional descriptive correlational study in accordance with the STROBE guidelines across 24 critical care units at Tanta University Main Hospital. A total of 306 critical care nurses participated. We collected data using a demographic questionnaire, the TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ), and the Nursing Vigilance Scale (NVS). Descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation, and simple linear regression analyses were performed using IBM SPSS version 26.0.

resultsOverall TeamSTEPPS teamwork was strongly and positively correlated with nurses' vigilance (r = 0.731, p < 0.001). All TeamSTEPPS dimensions demonstrated significant positive associations with vigilance. Among the teamwork dimensions, situation monitoring (r = 0.659) and leadership (r = 0.648) exhibited the most robust correlations with overall vigilance, while communication recorded the lowest mean percentage score among the teamwork domains.

conclusionTeamSTEPPS teamwork was significantly and positively associated with vigilance in critical care settings and was a significant predictor of vigilance scores in the regression model. Due to the cross-sectional nature of the design, these results should be interpreted as statistical associations rather than causal effects. Since teamwork competencies are important for clinical work, further research is needed to explore causal relationships between teamwork competencies, proactive patient monitoring, and patient safety, including longitudinal and intervention studies. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Nursing managers should prioritize strengthening teamwork practices and teamwork-related competencies to improve communication, mutual support, and situational awareness among critical nurses, thereby enhancing vigilance and overall patient safety outcomes.

Indexed as

Critical CareNursesPatient Care TeamAdultCooperative BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLeadershipMaleMiddle AgedPatient SafetySurveys and Questionnairescritical care nursingnurses’ vigilancepatient caresituation monitoringTeamSTEPPSteamwork

Identifiers

PMID42811585
PMCPMC13624384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.