ArticleZhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi2026
[Expert consensus on the application of the hydrosurgery system in wound debridement (2026 edition)].
Article in Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
As a novel surgical debridement device, the hydrosurgery system has significant clinical value in facilitating wound healing and wound bed preparation. Compared with conventional surgical debridement, the hydrosurgery system possesses prominent advantages, including high tissue selectivity, a high safety profile, and precise debridement performance, leading to its increasingly expanded application in wound management. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding the rational use of the system, accurate mastery of the key operational essentials, as well as accurate identification of indications and contraindications or relative contraindications for this system. Accordingly, the Wound Repair Professional Committee of Chinese Medical Doctor Association assembled renowned experts in the fields of burns, trauma, and wound repair in China. Based on evidence-based medical evidence, combined with domestic and international research advances and clinical practice experience, the committee formulated the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.